General
In the Matter of the Application of Otto Gillig, an Attorney and Counselor at Law, Appellant, for an Adjudication of Said Attorney's Rights in the Matter of Nicole De Paris, Inc., Plaintiff, Respondent, v. Harry Kalman, Defendant
258 A.D. 1040·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1940·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Otto Gillig, an Attorney and Counselor at Law, Appellant, for an Adjudication of Said Attorney’s Rights in the Matter of Nicole De Paris, Inc., Plaintiff, Respondent, v. Harry Kalman, Defendant.
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously reversed, with, twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter referred to an official referee to hear and report to the court at Special Term. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.