Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Albert W. S. Proctor, Appellant, v. The Kings County Republican General Committee et al., Respondents, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 639 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Albert W. S. Proctor, Appellant, v. The Kings County Republican General Committee et al., Respondents
168 N.Y. 639·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Albert W. S. Proctor, Appellant, v. The Kings County Republican General Committee et al., Respondents.
People ex rel. Proctor v. Kings Co. Republican Committee, 63 App. Div. 438, affirmed.
(Argued September 30, 1901;
decided October 18, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 30, 1901, which affirmed an order of Special Term dismissing a proceeding brought to review the action of the Kings County Republican General Committee in enrolling the name of George S. Elliott as a member of said committee.
Charles Bradshaw for appellant.
Henry Escher, Jr., and George F. Elliott for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landón, JJ. Dissenting: Parker, Ch. J.