General
The Union Bank et al., Appellants, v. Frederick A. Sherwood, Respondent, Impleaded with Others
162 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Union Bank et al., Appellants, v. Frederick A. Sherwood, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.
(Argued February 7, 1900;
decided March 27, 1900.)
Appeal, by permission, from so much of a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department as affirms that part of a judgment dismissing the complaint as to the defendant Frederick A. Sherwood, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at an Equity Term.
John Van Voorhis for appellants.
William F. Cogswell and M. H. McMath for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion in Commercial Bank and Menzo Van Voorhis v. Frederick A. Sherwood, Impleaded, etc. (162 N. Y. 310).
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.