Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Parsons et al. v. Knopp et ux.; National Indian Youth Council et al. v. Bruce et al.; Thevis v. United States; Technical Development Corp. et al. v. United States; Tidewater Oil Co. v. United States et al.; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States et al.; Mervin v. Federal Trade Commission; Kuntzweiler v. United States; Baldridge et al. v. Hadley et al.; Lowe et al. v. Union Oil Co. of California et al.; Konigsberg et al. v. Nixon; Umphrey et al. v. McGraw-Edison Co.; Manzardo et al. v. Pullman Co. et al.; DeMichele et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.; Kokoszka v. Belford, Trustee in Bankruptcy; Huguez v. California; Frazier v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1974 — 419 U.S. 886 · caselaw · US