Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Daniel Gould, Deceased; Elam A. Hatch, Respondent, v. Mahlon J. Gould, Appellant, 1892 — 131 N.Y. 630 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Daniel Gould, Deceased; Elam A. Hatch, Respondent, v. Mahlon J. Gould, Appellant
131 N.Y. 630·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Daniel Gould, Deceased. Elam A. Hatch, Respondent, v. Mahlon J. Gould, Appellant.
(Argued February 12, 1892;
decided March 1, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made April 11, 1890, which affirmed a decree of the surrogate of the county of Monroe admitting to probate the will of Daniel Gould, deceased.
O. B. Gould for appellant.
J. A. Stull for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.