Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Margaret E. Clark, Appellant, v. Edward Tracy Scovill et al., as Executors of John Hyland, Deceased, Respondents, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 541 · caselaw · US
General
Margaret E. Clark, Appellant, v. Edward Tracy Scovill et al., as Executors of John Hyland, Deceased, Respondents
185 N.Y. 541·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret E. Clark, Appellant, v. Edward Tracy Scovill et al., as Executors of John Hyland, Deceased, Respondents.
Clark v. Scovill, 111 App. Div. 35, appeal dismissed.
(Argued April 17, 1906;
decided May 1, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 1Y, 1906, which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the answer and overruled such demurrer in an action to recover on a promissory note.
Charles D. Newton and Charles W. Stevens for appellant.
Fletaher C. Peck for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.