Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Goldstein, aka Pietraru, et al. v. Cox et al., 1969 — 396 U.S. 873 · caselaw · US
General
Goldstein, aka Pietraru, et al. v. Cox et al.
396 U.S. 873·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 66.
Goldstein, aka Pietraru, et al. v. Cox et al.
Martin Popper on the motion. Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. S. D. N. Y. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 394 U. S. 996.] Motion of Wolf Popper Ross Wolf & Jones for leave to file reply brief as amicus curiae granted.