Bankruptcy
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvin S. EKKELKAMP, Defendant-Appellant
75 F. App'x 624·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·2003
Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Marvin S. EKKELKAMP, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-30142.
D.C. No. CR-00-00259-MJP.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.
Decided Sept. 15, 2003.
Edsonya Charles, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Brian R. Phillips, Peter Mazzone, Phillips and Mazzone, Lawyers, Everett, WA, Marvin S. Ekkelkamp, Wildomar, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
[MAJORITY]
MEMORANDUM
Marvin S. Ekkelkamp appeals his conviction and sentence imposed after a jury trial for bankruptcy fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 157(1) and use of a false social security number, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Ekkelkamp has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Ekkelkamp has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 88, 109 S.Ct. 846, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. All pending motions are denied.