Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. THACKER, 1930 — 44 F.2d 789 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES v. THACKER
44 F.2d 789·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. THACKER.
No. 6035.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 22, 1930.
H. M. Holden, U. S. Atty., and D. W. McGregor, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Houston, Tex., and Chas. R. Guinn, Regional Atty. U. S. Veterans’ Bureau, of San Antonio, Tex., for the United States.
Y. D. Mathes, of Houston, Tex. (S. H. German and Baker, Botts, Parker & Garwood, all of Houston, Tex., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BRYAN and FOSTER, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appellant failed to file in this court the record or assignment of errors within the time allowed by our rules 11 and 16, or to apply to a judge of this court for an extension of time. On motion of appellee, the appeal is dismissed.