Administrative
In re: UPLAND PARTNERS, Debtor, William S. Ellis, Jr., Appellant, v. Kessner Duca Umebayashi Bain & Matsunaga, Appellee, and Richard B. Emery; et al., Trustees
183 F. App'x 692·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·2006
Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re: UPLAND PARTNERS, Debtor, William S. Ellis, Jr., Appellant, v. Kessner Duca Umebayashi Bain & Matsunaga, Appellee, and Richard B. Emery; et al., Trustees.
No. 05-16698.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2006.
Filed June 9, 2006.
Timothy I. MacMaster, Honolulu, HI, for Debtor.
William S. Ellis, Jr., Honolulu, HI, pro se.
Steven Guttman, Esq., Kessner Duca Umebayashi Bain & Matsunaga, Honolulu, HI, for Appellee.
Steven Guttman, Esq., Lyle S. Hosoda, Esq., Lyle S. Hosoda & Associates, Office of the U.S. Trustee First Hawaiian Tower, Honolulu, HI, for Trustees.
Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
[MAJORITY]
MEMORANDUM
We have reviewed appellant’s response to the order to show cause. This appeal is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. See Tahoe-Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Rg’l Planning Agency, 322 F.3d 1064, 1077 (9th Cir.2003).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.