Securities
Baker, Obermeier & Rosner v. Surface Transit, Inc., et al.; Saxe, Bacon & O'Shea v. Surface Transit, Inc. et al.; Hays, St. John, Abramson & Heilbron v. Garlock et al.; Gans v. Surface Transit, Inc., et al.; and Garlock v. Surface Transit, Inc., et al.
361 U.S. 862·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 284.
No. 285.
No. 374.
No. 382.
No. 384.
Baker, Obermeier & Rosner v. Surface Transit, Inc., et al.; Saxe, Bacon & O’Shea v. Surface Transit, Inc. et al.; Hays, St. John, Abramson & Heilbron v. Garlock et al.; Gans v. Surface Transit, Inc., et al.; and Garlock v. Surface Transit, Inc., et al.
Oscar S. Rosner for petitioner in No.. 284. Ralph M. Carson, Thomas O’Gorman FitzGibbon and Philip C. Potter, Jr. for petitioner in No. 285. Osmond K. Fraenkel and Morris Shilensky for petitioner in No. 374. Hiram S. Gans, petitioner in No. 382, pro se. Edward M. Garlock, petitioner in No. 384 and respondent in No. 374, pro se. John A. Wilson, W. M. L. Robinson and M. Van Voorhies for Surface Transit, Inc., et al., respondents. Solicitor General Rankin, Thomas G. Meeker and David Ferber (also Arthur Blasberg, Jr. in Nos. 284 arid 382) for the Securities and Exchange Commission, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.