Torts · MBE-tested
Paul Dahlman, Respondent, v. Globe Storage and Carpet Cleaning Company, Appellant
163 A.D. 939·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1914·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Paul Dahlman, Respondent, v. Globe Storage and Carpet Cleaning Company, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 10th day of September, 1913, upon a verdict, and also from an order entered on the 9th day of October, 1913, denying a motion for a new trial.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
We think there is no evidence to justify a finding that the defendant was negligent or that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed. Order to be settled on notice.