Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LIM LOCK, Appellant, v. John D. NAGLE, as Commissioner of Immigration, etc., Appellee, 1930 — 41 F.2d 1004 · caselaw · US
General
LIM LOCK, Appellant, v. John D. NAGLE, as Commissioner of Immigration, etc., Appellee
41 F.2d 1004·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LIM LOCK, Appellant, v. John D. NAGLE, as Commissioner of Immigration, etc., Appellee.
No. 6078.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 19, 1930.
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Motion of appellee to dismiss appeal for failure of appellant to print record and file brief (noncomplianee with Rules 23 and 24 of the Rules of Practice of this court) granted, and appeal dismissed.