General
Burst Industries, Inc. v. United States, protests 65/18615 and 65/18047 (New York)
57 Cust. Ct. 796·United States Customs Court·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. P66/162. —
Burst Industries, Inc. v. United States, protests 65/18615 and 65/18047 (New York).
[MAJORITY — Rao, C. J.]
Rao, C. J.
In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rotary lawn sprinklers or metal parts thereof, dedicated for use therewith, similar in all material respects to those the subject of The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.