Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jane Remsen, Appellant, v. Charles A. Wingert, Respondent, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 632 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Jane Remsen, Appellant, v. Charles A. Wingert, Respondent
188 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jane Remsen, Appellant, v. Charles A. Wingert, Respondent.
(Argued May 6, 1907;
decided May 21, 1907.)
Remsen v. Wingert, 112 App. Div. 234, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 1, 1906, upon an order reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, and directing judgment in favor of defendant .on his counterclaim in an action to compel the specific performance of a contract for the purchase of real property.
John Fhoen and William R. Wilder for appellant.
Theodore T. Baylor for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.