Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Harmon v. United States; Lesser v. Martin, Warden; Nicol et al. v. National Savings & Trust Co., Executor; Miller v. Town of Suffield et al.; Switzer v. United States; Jordan v. Arizona; Roark v. West et al.; Jones v. United States; Crabtree v. United States; Lozoya v. Ramirez et al.; Peabody v. Gulotta, District Attorney of Nassau County, New York; Wolf v. Brownell, Attorney General, et al.; Miller, alias Warner, v. Illinois, 1958 — 358 U.S. 859 · caselaw · US