General
Carmen B. Ginnel, Respondent, v. Charles C. Lockwood, as Committee of the Person and Property of William S. Ginnel, an Incompetent Person, et al, Defendants, and Frank Ginnel et al., Appellants
3 A.D.2d 921·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1957·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Carmen B. Ginnel, Respondent, v. Charles C. Lockwood, as Committee of the Person and Property of William S. Ginnel, an Incompetent Person, et al, Defendants, and Frank Ginnel et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
In an action for a judgment declaring (1) a Nevada decree of divorce to be invalid and (2) the rights of certain of the parties in relation to a certain trust indenture, and for other relief, the appeal is from so much of an order as denies appellants’ motion, pursuant to subdivisions 1 and 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the second, third and fourth causes of action alleged in the complaint. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [3 Misc 2d 756.]