Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NOTT ATWATER COMPANY, Appellant, v. Burns POE, Collector of Internal Revenue, etc., Appellee, 1930 — 42 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
Tax
NOTT ATWATER COMPANY, Appellant, v. Burns POE, Collector of Internal Revenue, etc., Appellee
42 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NOTT ATWATER COMPANY, Appellant, v. Burns POE, Collector of Internal Revenue, etc., Appellee.
No. 6231.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 17, 1930.
Otto B. Rupp, of Seattle, Wash., and Alex M. Winston, of Spokane, Wash., for appellant.
Anthony Savage, U. S. Atty., of Seattle, Wash., and John R. Wheeler, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before DIETRICH and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and WEBSTER, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Ordered judgment of District Court [33 F.(2d) 1000] affirmed; mandate forthwith,