Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, 1938 — 305 U.S. 564 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach
305 U.S. 56483 L. Ed. 355·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Mr. Justice Butler and Mr. Justice Stone took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10.
United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach.
Argued October 12, 1938.
Decided October 17, 1938.
Mr. Cordon Dean, with whom Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General McMahon, and Messrs. Mahlon D. Kiefer and W. Marvin Smith, for the United States.
Messrs. Duane R. Dills and Eugene E. Heaton for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Butler and Mr. Justice Stone took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.