Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lawrence Summerfield, Appellant, 1904 — 180 N.Y. 511 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lawrence Summerfield, Appellant
180 N.Y. 511·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lawrence Summerfield, Appellant.
People v. Summerfield, 96 App. Div. 636, affirmed. ,
(Argued November 29, 1904;
decided December 13, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 18, 1904, which affirmed a judgment rendered at a Trial Term upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree.
Davicl B. Hill and Max D. Steuer for appellant.
William Travers Jerome, District Attorney (Robert O. Taylor of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of conviction affirmed ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, J J.