General
Joseph A. Benedetto, Respondent, v. Harry Hanbury, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Ninetieth Street Garage, and George Hanbury, Appellants, and Others, Defendants
243 A.D. 715·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph A. Benedetto, Respondent, v. Harry Hanbury, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Ninetieth Street Garage, and George Hanbury, Appellants, and Others, Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, without costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Johnston, JJ.