General
Athina Buyukas et al., Appellants, v. Emanuel Steffand et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of New Olympic Hotel, Respondents
2 A.D.2d 888·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1956·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(November 5, 1956)
Athina Buyukas et al., Appellants, v. Emanuel Steffand et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of New Olympic Hotel, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion upon proper notice (Appellate Division, Second Department Rules, rule VII; Civ. Prac. Act, § 164). Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Hallinan, JJ.