Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ebanks v. Hale, Warden, 1897 — 168 U.S. 707 · caselaw · US
General
Ebanks v. Hale, Warden
168 U.S. 707·Supreme Court of the United States·1897
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 501.
Ebanks v. Hale, Warden.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States-for the Northern District of California.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted December 13, 1897.
Decided December 20, 1897.
Mr. T. C. Catchings, Mr. W. F. Fitzgerald and Mr. W. H. Anderson in support of motions.
[MAJORITY — Per'Curiam.]
Per'Curiam.
Order affirmed with costs on the authority of Durrant v. Hale, &c., Warden, 168 U. S. 705.