Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Willis Shaw Frozen Express, Inc., v. United States et al., 1963 — 375 U.S. 876 · caselaw · US
General
Willis Shaw Frozen Express, Inc., v. United States et al.
375 U.S. 876·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 201.
Willis Shaw Frozen Express, Inc., v. United States et al.
John H. Joyce, A. Alois Layne and Lester M. Bridgeman for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Elliott H. Moyer, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. Probable jurisdiction noted.