Criminal Law · MBE-tested

THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. GUY CASCIO et al., Appellants

131 Cal. App. 643·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1933·CA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

[Crim. No. 1246. Third Appellate District. May 8, 1933.] THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. GUY CASCIO et al., Appellants. Ray T. Coughlin for Appellants. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent. [MAJORITY — THE COURT.] THE COURT. The appellants were convicted in the Superior Court of San Joaquin County of a felony, to wit: Robbery of the first degree. The transcript on appeal was filed in this court December 30, 1932. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellants. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on May 8, 1933. No appearance was made for appellants at the time the ease was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.