Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lizzie M. Palmer et al., Respondents, v. Hickory Grove Cemetery, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 593 · caselaw · US
General
Lizzie M. Palmer et al., Respondents, v. Hickory Grove Cemetery, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
186 N.Y. 593·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lizzie M. Palmer et al., Respondents, v. Hickory Grove Cemetery, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Palmer v. Hickory Grove Cemetery, 106 App. Div. 613, affirmed.
(Argued November 20, 1906;
decided December 4, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second, judicial department, entered July 10, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to restrain the defendant from acquiring certain lands for cemetery purposes.
Charles A. Wendell and Alfred IF". Kiddle for appellant.
J. Addison Young, Charles H. Young and Wilson Brown, Jr., for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Yann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.