Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al. v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Western, & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees et al.; and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Western, & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees et al., 1964 — 377 U.S. 918 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al. v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Western, & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees et al.; and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Western, & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees et al.
377 U.S. 918·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 935.
No. 1007.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al. v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Western, & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees et al. ; and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Western, & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees et al.
Lester P. Schoene, Milton Kramer, Harold C. Heiss, Edward B. Henslee, Jr. and Ruth Weyand for petitioners in No. 935.
Max Matin and Ruth Weyand for petitioner in No. 1007.
Francis M. Shea, William H. Dempsey, Jr. and Richard J. Flynn for respondent carriers in both cases.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, J. William Doolittle and David L. Rose for the United States et al., respondents in both cases.
Paul O’Dwyer and Howard N. Meyer for Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, as amicus curiae, in support of the petitions.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied. Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion or these petitions.
Reported below:-U. S. App. D. C.-, 331 F. 2d 1020.