Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Co. et al. v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co. et al., 1944 — 322 U.S. 747 · caselaw · US
General
Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Co. et al. v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co. et al.
322 U.S. 747·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 911, 912, and 913.
Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Co. et al. v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co. et al.
May 22, 1944.
Messrs. Arthur M. Cox, Frederic H. Stafford, Andrew J. Dallstream, Carleton S. Hadley, and Elmer W. Freytag for petitioners.
Messrs. John C. Slade, Frank H. Towner, Bryce L. Hamilton, H. V. Spike, Clyde E. Shorey, and Fred Barth for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.