Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Du Shen Tau et al., Appellants, v. United States; Lee Chin Ching, Appellant, v. United States; and Moy Yee Tai et al., Appellants, v. United States, 1902 — 187 U.S. 652 · caselaw · US
General
Du Shen Tau et al., Appellants, v. United States; Lee Chin Ching, Appellant, v. United States; and Moy Yee Tai et al., Appellants, v. United States
187 U.S. 652·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 485.
No. 486.
No. 487.
Du Shen Tau et al., Appellants, v. United States; Lee Chin Ching, Appellant, v. United States; and Moy Yee Tai et al., Appellants, v. United States.
October 27, 1902.
on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Bicha/rds for the appellee. No one opposing.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.
Docketed and dismissed,