General

Jon A. Gika, Appellant, v. Manchester Realty Associates, Respondent, et al., Defendant

87 A.D.3d 675928 N.Y.S.2d 641·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2011·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Jon A. Gika, Appellant, v Manchester Realty Associates, Respondent, et al., Defendant. [928 NYS2d 641] [MAJORITY] The defendant Manchester Realty Associates (hereinafter Manchester) established, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted Manchester’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Rivera, J.E, Covello, Florio and Lott, JJ., concur.