General
Frederick H. Vogt, Appellant, v. Matilda S. Vogt, by her Guardian ad litem, Pauline Vogt
203 U.S. 581·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 62.
Frederick H. Vogt, Appellant, v. Matilda S. Vogt, by her Guardian ad litem, Pauline Vogt.
Argued for appellant October 25 and 26, 1906.
Decided October 29, 1906.
Mr. John C. Gittihgs for appellant. Mr. Leon Tobriner and Mr. J. J. Darlington for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
The court declined to hear further argument.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; California Consolidated Mining Company v. Manley, ante, p. 579, and cases cited.