Securities

Roberts, for the use of Quantrill, v. Reintzell

2 D.C. 2352 Cranch 235·United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia·1821

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Roberts, for the use of Quantrill, v. Reintzell. If the plaintiff reside out of the district, and the person for whose use the suit is entered upon the docket remove from the district, the Court will ordér the plaintiff to give security for the costs. When this suit was brought for the use of Quantrill, he resided in this district, but having afterwards removed from the district, and plaintiff being a non-resident, Mr. Key, for the defendant, moved the Court for a rule on the plaintiff to give security for the costs. Mr. Jones, for the plaintiff, objected. [MAJORITY — the Court] But the Court granted the rule.