Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Dethlef C. Hansen, Appellant. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Respondent, 1908 — 192 N.Y. 538 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of Dethlef C. Hansen, Appellant. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Respondent
192 N.Y. 538·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Dethlef C. Hansen, Appellant. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Respondent.
Matter of Hansen, 120 App. Div. 377, affirmed.
(Argued April 1, 1908;
decided April 21, 1908.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 24, 1907, suspending the appellant from practice as an attorney and counselor at law.
Frank Moss and Isidor Wels for appellant.
Austen G. Fox for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.