General
CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE v. THOMPSON
193 F. 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1912
Before PARDEE ami McCORMICK, Circuit Judges, and MAXEY, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE v. THOMPSON.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 5, 1912.)
No. 2,251.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida.
E. P. Axtell and O. D. Rinehart, for plaintiff in error.
Wm. W. Dewhurst and George C. Bedel) (Horatio Bisbee, on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before PARDEE ami McCORMICK, Circuit Judges, and MAXEY, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
A majority of the judges are of opinion that the assignments of error based upon the six-months limitation found in the charter of the city of St. Augustine are not well taken. All agree that otherwise the case was correctly ruled, and should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.