Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
VINAL v. WEST VIRGINIA OIL & OIL LAND COMPANY, 1884 — 110 U.S. 215 · caselaw · US
General
VINAL v. WEST VIRGINIA OIL & OIL LAND COMPANY
110 U.S. 21528 L. Ed. 124·Supreme Court of the United States·1884
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
VINAL v. WEST VIRGINIA OIL & OIL LAND COMPANY.
IN ERROR TO THE OIROUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WÉST VIRGINIA. ' .
Submitted January 10th, 1884.
Decided January 21st, 1884.
Action — Error—Partnership.
Mr. John A. Hutchinson for plaintiff in error.
Mr. j¥. Goff, Jr., for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Waite]
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
This judgment is affirmed. One partner cannot recover his share of a debt due to the partnership in an action at law, prosecuted in his own name alone against the debtor. That is the only question presented by the bill of exceptions in this casé. The refusal of the' court below to grant a new trial is not reviewable here.
Affirmed.