Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Albrecht et al. v. United States; Linnenbringer v. United States; Pitman et al. v. United States; Oliver, Executor, et al. v. United States; and Q. W. S. S. Realty & Investment Co. v. United States, 1946 — 329 U.S. 694 · caselaw · US
General
Albrecht et al. v. United States; Linnenbringer v. United States; Pitman et al. v. United States; Oliver, Executor, et al. v. United States; and Q. W. S. S. Realty & Investment Co. v. United States
329 U.S. 694·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 148.
No. 149.
No. 150.
Albrecht et al. v. United States; Linnenbringer v. United States; Pitman et al. v. United States; Oliver, Executor, et al. v. United States; and Q. W. S. S. Realty & Investment Co. v. United States.
No. 151.
No. 155.
October 14, 1946.
George Eigel and William L. Igoe for petitioners in No. 148.
Roscoe Anderson for petitioner in No. 149.
William H. Allen for petitioners in No. 150.
William L. Igoe for petitioners in No. 151.
Samuel M. Watson for petitioner in No. 155.
Solicitor General Mc-Grath, Roger P. Marquis and Wilma C. Martin for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.
Reported below: 155 F. 2d 73, 77.