Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles R. Batt et al., Respondents, v. Harvey C. West et al., as Assessors of the Town of Madrid, Appellants, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles R. Batt et al., Respondents, v. Harvey C. West et al., as Assessors of the Town of Madrid, Appellants
172 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles R. Batt et al., Respondents, v. Harvey C. West et al., as Assessors of the Town of Madrid, Appellants.
People ex rel, Batt v. West, 66 App. Div. 617, affirmed.
(Argued November 10, 1902;
decided November 25, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 20, 1901, which affirmed an order of Special Term reducing an assessment upon the real property of the relator.
Vasco P. Abbott and F. J. Merriman for appellants.
John P. Badger for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Cullen, JJ.