Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rodriguez v. New York; Mounsey v. New York, 1959 — 361 U.S. 812 · caselaw · US
General
Rodriguez v. New York; Mounsey v. New York
361 U.S. 812·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 21,
No. 161,
Misc.
Misc.
Rodriguez v. New York. Mounsey v. New York.
Walter Gellhom, Esquire, of New York, New York, is appointed to serve as counsel for petitioners in these cases. Frank S. Hogan for respondent in No. 21, Mise. Paxton Blair, Solicitor General of New York, for respondent in No. 161, Mise.
[MAJORITY]
On .petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department; and
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York. Motions for leave to proceed in forma -pauperis and petitions for writs of certiorari granted.' Cases transferred to the appellate docket and counsel are directed in their briefs and oral arguments to discuss the case of Burns v. Ohio, 360 U. S. 252.