Corporations

MOORE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Edward F. PONATH, Appellee

14 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1926

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

MOORE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Edward F. PONATH, Appellee. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. October 20, 1926.) No. 3718. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Joshua R. H. Potts, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Arthur C. Eckert, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellee. Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. Appellant (defendant in District Court) complains of the refusal of the District Court to grant an injunction pendente lite, restraining appellee from notifying the public that he had begun suits against alleged infringers of the patent sued on, and from sending out advertising matter describing the patent as a “pioneer” invention. We find nothing in the record to convince us that in its action in that behalf the District Court transgressed or abused that sound discretion which in such matters it may and should exercise. The order appealed from is affirmed.