Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wood v. Milyard, Warden, et al., 2011 — 564 U.S. 1066 · caselaw · US
General
Wood v. Milyard, Warden, et al.
564 U.S. 1066·Supreme Court of the United States·2011
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10-9995.
Wood v. Milyard, Warden, et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following questions: (1) Does an appellate court have the authority to raise sua sponte a 28 U. S. C. § 2244(d) statute of limitations defense? (2) Does the State’s declaration before the District Court that it “will not challenge, but [is] not conceding, the timeliness of Wood’s habeas petition,” amount to a deliberate waiver of any statute of limitations defense the State may have had?