Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joshua W. Darden, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Arkansas, 1906 — 200 U.S. 615 · caselaw · US
General
Joshua W. Darden, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Arkansas
200 U.S. 615·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 222.
Joshua W. Darden, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Arkansas.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted February 19, 1906.
Decided February 26, 1906.
Mr. Joe T. Robinson for plaintiff in error. Mr. Thomas B. Martin for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction.- Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Haseltine v. Bank, 183. U. S. 130; California National Bank v. Stateler, 171 U. S. 447; Kirby’s Digest Statutes of Arkansas, § 1790.