Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Henry Whitson, Appellant, v. Henry J. David, Respondent, 1880 — 81 N.Y. 645 · caselaw · US
General
John Henry Whitson, Appellant, v. Henry J. David, Respondent
81 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1880·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Henry Whitson, Appellant, v. Henry J. David, Respondent.
(Submitted June 10, 1880;
decided June 18, 1880.)
This case was tried before a jury and a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant made a motion for a new trial upon the minutes of the trial judge, and an order was entered denying such motion. Judgment was entered upon the verdict, and the defendant appealed from the order and the judgment to the General Term, where both the order and the judgment were reversed and a new trial granted. From the order granting the new trial the plaintiff brought this appeal.
The court say : “ It is settled by numerous decisions in this i court that such an order is not appealable. ( Wright v. Hunter, 46 1ST. T. 409; Sa/nds v. GrooTce, id. 564; Dickson v. Broadway, etc., B. li. Go., 47 id. 507; Downing v. Kelly, 48 id. 433 ; Ha/rris v. Burdett, 73 id. 136.) ”
Walter S. Logan for appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Earl, J., reads for dismissal of appeal
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.