General
Protests 912012-G, etc., of S. Lisk & Bro. et al. (New York)
1 Cust. Ct. 507·United States Customs Court·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the First Division,
November 30, 1938
No. 39967.
Protests 912012-G, etc., of S. Lisk & Bro. et al. (New York).
[MAJORITY — McClelland, P. J.]
Opinion by
McClelland, P. J.
The samples are representations of bananas, peaches, cucumbers, tangerines, etc., obviously made of rubber and colored-. Concealed, generally in the stems, is a squeaker which makes a noise when the sides are pressed. On the authority of Veit v. United States (11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 81, T. D. 38732) they were found to be artificial fruits and vegetables and held properly classified at 60 percent under paragraph 1518. Shallus v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 87, T. D. 40937) cited.