General
Horlbeck et al. v. Walther
131 Colo. 36279 P.2d 434·Colorado Supreme Court·1955·CO
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 17,428.
Horlbeck et al. v. Walther.
(279 P. [2d] 434)
Decided January 17, 1955.
Rehearing denied January 31, 1955.
Mr. Howard E. Erickson, for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Elias J. Candell, for defendant in error.
En Banc.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Nowhere in the record submitted by plaintiffs in error does it appear that a judgment was entered against them in the trial court. We find original and amended findings of fact by the trial judge and direction to the clerk for the entry of judgment, but no such judgment was ever entered of record in the trial court. Rule 112 (a) R.C.P. Colo., requiring the inclusion of the judgment in the record is mandatory, and without a compliance therewith there is nothing for this court to review. Savageau, Inc. v. Larsen, 117 Colo. 229, 185 (2d) 1012; Howard v. American Law Book Co. 121 Colo. 5, 212 P. (2d) 1006. The writ of error is, therefore, dismissed.