Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Emma J. Raub, Appellant, v. The New York Life Insurance Company, Respondent, 1890 — 120 N.Y. 659 · caselaw · US
General
Emma J. Raub, Appellant, v. The New York Life Insurance Company, Respondent
120 N.Y. 659·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emma J. Raub, Appellant, v. The New York Life Insurance Company, Respondent.
(Argued June 5, 1890;
decided June 24, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made the second Monday of February, 1888, which affirmed a judgment .in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Q. A. Clement for appellant.
William B. Hornblower for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
• All concur, except Vann and Brown, JJ., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.