Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Timothy HOUFF v. STATE of Arkansas

345 Ark. 57247 S.W.3d 888·Arkansas Supreme Court·2001·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Timothy HOUFF v. STATE of Arkansas CR 01-595 47 S.W.3d 888 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered July 9, 2001 Sullivan Law Firm, P.L.L.C., by: Kelly J. Adkins, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Appellant, Timothy Houff, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Kelly J. Adkins, admits in her motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Ln re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.