Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Washington State Board Against Discrimination et al. v. O'Meara et al.; and Jones et al. v. O'Meara et al., 1962 — 369 U.S. 839 · caselaw · US
General
Washington State Board Against Discrimination et al. v. O'Meara et al.; and Jones et al. v. O'Meara et al.
369 U.S. 839·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted, the judgment vacated and the cases remanded to the Supreme Court of Washington to ascertain whether such judgment was based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 727.
No. 730.
Washington State Board Against Discrimination et al. v. O'Meara et al.; and Jones et al. v. O’Meara et al.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted, the judgment vacated and the cases remanded to the Supreme Court of Washington to ascertain whether such judgment was based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.
John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Herbert H. Fuller, Deputy Attorney General, for petitioners in No. 727.
Francis Hoague for petitioners in No. 730.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Washington. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 58 Wash. 2d 793, 365 P. 2d 1.