Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Don ROPER, Warden, applicant, v. Allen L. NICKLASSON., 2013 — 134 S. Ct. 822 · caselaw · US
General
Don ROPER, Warden, applicant, v. Allen L. NICKLASSON.
134 S. Ct. 822187 L. Ed. 2d 623·Supreme Court of the United States·2013
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Don ROPER, Warden, applicant,
v.
Allen L. NICKLASSON.
No. 13A594.
Supreme Court of the United States
Dec. 11, 2013.
Case below, 967 S.W.2d 967.
Application to vacate the stay of execution of sentence of death entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on December 9, 2013, presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court granted. Justice GINSBURG, with whom Justice BREYER, Justice SOTOMAYOR, and Justice KAGAN join, dissenting. I would deny the application to vacate the stay of execution entered by the Court of Appeals. See Bowersox v. Williams, 517 U.S. 345, 347, 116 S.Ct. 1312, 134 L.Ed.2d 494 (1996) (GINSBURG, J., dissenting). ("At the very least, before acting irretrievably, this Court might have invited prompt clarification of the Court of Appeals' [stay] order. Appreciation of our own fallibility, and respect for the judgment of an appellate tribunal closer to the scene than we are, as I see it, demand as much.").