General
Amelia Gorman, as Executrix of John J. Gorman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Daniel E. Finn et al., Appellants. (Actions 1 and 2.)
171 N.Y. 628·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Amelia Gorman, as Executrix of John J. Gorman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Daniel E. Finn et al., Appellants. (Actions 1 and 2.)
Gorman v. Finn, 56 App. Div. 155, affirmed,
(Argued April 1,1902;
decided April 15, 1902.)
Appeals from two judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 9, 1901, affirming one judgment and modifying and affirming as modified another in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new' trial.
T. B. Chancellor, W. M. K. Olcott and Patrick H. Loftus for appellants.
Archibald C. Shenstone and John T. Canavan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments affirmed, with one bill of costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight and Martin, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.