Contracts · MBE-tested
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al. v. Reddish et al.; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Reddish et al.; and Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., et al. v. Reddish et al.
365 U.S. 877·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 714.
No. 723.
No. 725.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al. v. Reddish et al.; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Reddish et al.; and Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., et al. v. Reddish et al.
Amos M. Mathews for appellants in No. 714.
Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for appellant in No. 723.
Roland Rice and Rollo E. Kidwell for appellants in No. 725.
Solicitor General Cox filed a memorandum for the United States suggesting that the Court note probable jurisdiction.
Clarence D. Todd for Contract Carrier Conference of American Trucking Assns., Inc., appellee in No. 714.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Reported below: 188 F. Supp. 160.